4.6 Article

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator missing the first four transmembrane segments increases wild type and ΔF508 processing

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 283, Issue 32, Pages 21926-21933

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M709156200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL51811-06] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously generated an adenoassociated viral gene therapy vector, rAAV-Delta 264 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), missing the first four transmembrane domains of CFTR. When infected into monkey lungs, Delta 264 CFTR increased the levels of endogenous wild type CFTR protein. To understand this process, we transfected Delta 264 CFTR plasmid cDNA into COS7 cells, and we noted that protein expression from the truncation mutant is barely detectable when compared with wild type or Delta F508 CFTR. Delta 264 CFTR protein expression increases dramatically when cells are treated with proteasome inhibitors. Cycloheximide experiments show that Delta 264 CFTR is degraded faster than Delta F508 CFTR. VCP and HDAC6, two proteins involved in retrograde translocation from endoplasmic reticulum to cytosol for proteasomal and aggresomal degradation, coimmunoprecipitate with Delta 264 CFTR. In cotransfection studies in COS7 cells and in transfection of Delta 264 CFTR into cells stably expressing wild type and Delta F508 CFTR, Delta 264 CFTR increases wild type CFTR protein and increases levels of maturation of immature band B to mature band C of Delta F508 CFTR. Thus the adenoassociated viral vector, rAAV-Delta 264 CFTR, is a highly promising cystic fibrosis gene therapy vector because it increases the amount of mature bandC protein both from wild type and Delta F508 CFTR and associates with key elements in quality control mechanism of CFTR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available