4.7 Article

Ceftazidime-Avibactam Activity against Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated in US Medical Centers in 2012 and 2013

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 3656-3659

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.05024-14

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cerexa, Inc.
  2. Achaogen
  3. Actelion
  4. Affinium
  5. American Proficiency Institute (API)
  6. AmpliPhi Biosciences
  7. Anacor
  8. Astellas
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Basilea
  11. BioVersys
  12. Cardeas
  13. Cempra
  14. Cubist
  15. Daiichi Sankyo
  16. Dipexium
  17. Durata
  18. Exela
  19. Fedora
  20. Furiex
  21. Genentech
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Janssen
  24. Johnson Johnson
  25. Medpace
  26. Meiji Seika Kaisha
  27. Melinta
  28. Merck
  29. MethylGene
  30. Nabriva
  31. Nanosphere
  32. Novartis
  33. Pfizer
  34. Polyphor
  35. Rempex
  36. Roche
  37. Seachaid
  38. Shionogi
  39. Synthes
  40. Medicines Co.
  41. Theravance
  42. Thermo Fisher
  43. VenatoRx
  44. Vertex
  45. Waterloo
  46. Wockhardt
  47. Forest Laboratories, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (n = 3,902) from 75 U.S. medical centers were tested against ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents by the reference broth microdilution method. Overall, 96.9% of the strains were susceptible (MIC, <= 8 mu g/ml) to ceftazidime-avibactam, while the rates of susceptibility for ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam were 83.8, 81.9, and 78.5%, respectively. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant phenotypes were observed in 14.9 and 8.7% of the strains, respectively, and 81.0 and 73.7% of the strains were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available