4.4 Review

Neurobiology of rodent self-grooming and its value for translational neuroscience

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages 45-59

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2015.8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ZENEREI Research Center
  2. Guangdong Ocean University
  3. St. Petersburg State University [1.38.201.2014]
  4. US National Institutes of Health [NS025529, HD028341, MH060379, MH63649, DA015188]
  5. Government of Russian Federation [02.A03.21.0006]
  6. Government of Russian Federation (Ural Federal University)
  7. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R37HD028341] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD028341] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH060379, R01MH063649] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  10. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS025529, R56NS025529] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  11. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA015188] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-grooming is a complex innate behaviour with an evolutionarily conserved sequencing pattern and is one of the most frequently performed behavioural activities in rodents. In this Review, we discuss the neurobiology of rodent self-grooming, and we highlight studies of rodent models of neuropsychiatric disorders - including models of autism spectrum disorder and obsessive compulsive disorder - that have assessed self-grooming phenotypes. We suggest that rodent self-grooming may be a useful measure of repetitive behaviour in such models, and therefore of value to translational psychiatry. Assessment of rodent self-grooming may also be useful for understanding the neural circuits that are involved in complex sequential patterns of action.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available