4.4 Article

Functional Analysis of the Accessory Protein TapA in Bacillus subtilis Amyloid Fiber Assembly

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 196, Issue 8, Pages 1505-1513

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.01363-13

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. MEC/Fulbright postdoctoral fellowship from the Secretaria General de Estado de Universidades e Investigacion del Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (Spain)
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [RyC-2011-080605]
  3. [GM58213]
  4. [GM18546]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation relies on the assembly of a fibrous scaffold formed by the protein TasA. TasA polymerizes into highly stable fibers with biochemical and morphological features of functional amyloids. Previously, we showed that assembly of TasA fibers requires the auxiliary protein TapA. In this study, we investigated the roles of TapA sequences from the C-terminal and N-terminal ends and TapA cysteine residues in its ability to promote the assembly of TasA amyloid-like fibers. We found that the cysteine residues are not essential for the formation of TasA fibers, as their replacement by alanine residues resulted in only minor defects in biofilm formation. Mutating sequences in the C-terminal half had no effect on biofilm formation. However, we identified a sequence of 8 amino acids in the N terminus that is key for TasA fiber formation. Strains expressing TapA lacking these 8 residues were completely defective in biofilm formation. In addition, this TapA mutant protein exhibited a dominant negative effect on TasA fiber formation. Even in the presence of wild-type TapA, the mutant protein inhibited fiber assembly in vitro and delayed biofilm formation in vivo. We propose that this 8-residue sequence is crucial for the formation of amyloid-like fibers on the cell surface, perhaps by mediating the interaction between TapA or TapA and TasA molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available