4.4 Article

Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase IV (Pol IV), but Not Pol II, Dynamically Switches with a Stalled Pol III☆ Replicase

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 194, Issue 14, Pages 3589-3600

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00520-12

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Public Health Service grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM066094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dnaN159 allele encodes a temperature-sensitive mutant form of the beta sliding clamp (beta 159). SOS-induced levels of DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) confer UV sensitivity upon the dnaN159 strain, while levels of Pol IV similar to 4-fold higher than those induced by the SOS response severely impede its growth. Here, we used mutations in Pol IV that disrupted specific interactions with the beta clamp to test our hypothesis that these phenotypes were the result of Pol IV gaining inappropriate access to the replication fork via a Pol III star-Pol IV switch relying on both the rim and cleft of the clamp. Our results clearly demonstrate that Pol IV relied on both the clamp rim and cleft interactions for these phenotypes. In contrast to the case for Pol IV, elevated levels of the other Pols, including Pol II, which was expressed at levels similar to 8-fold higher than the normal SOS-induced levels, failed to impede growth of the dnaN159 strain. These findings suggest that the mechanism used by Pol IV to switch with Pol III star is distinct from those used by the other Pols. Results of experiments utilizing purified components to reconstitute the Pol III star-Pol II switch in vitro indicated that Pol II switched equally well with both a stalled and an actively replicating Pol III star in a manner that was independent of the rim contact required by Pol IV. These results provide compelling support for the Pol III star-Pol IV two-step switch model and demonstrate important mechanistic differences in how Pol IV and Pol II switch with Pol III star.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available