4.6 Review

Hypertension pharmacogenomics: in search of personalized treatment approaches

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 110-122

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2015.176

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH, NIGMS [U01 GM074492, U01 GM092586]
  2. NIH, NHGRI [U01 HG007269]
  3. NIH, NINDS [R01 NS073346, FDA U01 FD005235]
  4. FDA [602545, 1U01FD005235-01] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiovascular and renal diseases are associated with many risk factors, of which hypertension is one of the most prevalent. Worldwide, blood pressure control is only achieved in similar to 50% of those treated for hypertension, despite the availability of a considerable number of antihypertensive drugs from different pharmacological classes. Although many reasons exist for poor blood pressure control, a likely contributor is the inability to predict to which antihypertensive drug an individual is most likely to respond. Hypertension pharmacogenomics and other `omics' technologies have the potential to identify genetic signals that are predictive of response or adverse outcome to particular drugs, and guide selection of hypertension treatment for a given individual. Continued research in this field will enhance our understanding of how to maximally deploy the various antihypertensive drug classes to optimize blood pressure response at the individual level. This Review summarizes the available literature on the most convincing genetic signals associated with antihypertensive drug responses and adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Future research in this area will be facilitated by enhancing collaboration between research groups through consortia such as the International Consortium for Antihypertensives Pharmacogenomics Studies, with the goal of translating replicated findings into clinical implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available