4.3 Article

Analysis from avian visual perspective reveals plumage colour differences among females of capuchino seedeaters (Sporophila)

Journal

JOURNAL OF AVIAN BIOLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages 597-602

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.05205.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Argentina [PIP 5074, PIP 112-200801-00741]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 16/25271]
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Ontario Institute of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Females of the closely related capuchino seedeaters are difficult to distinguish from one another based on human visual perception of colouration and morphology. We examined plumage colour differences among females of four species, the tawny-bellied seedeater Sporophila hypoxantha, the dark-throated seedeater S. ruficollis, the rufous-rumped seedeater S. hypochroma, and the chesnut-bellied seedeater S. cinnamomea. Reflectance values were measured on museum skins, and interspecific differences were analyzed using the Vorobyev-Osorio avian colour discrimination model. Interspecific distances in the colour space calculated by the model were considerably higher than the threshold for colour discrimination, indicating the presence of colour differences among species that should be detectable by birds. Colour differences between S. hypoxantha and the other three species were the largest. A Discriminant Function Analysis showed that UV-wavelength was particularly important in species separation. Our results indicate that female plumage of these four species is considerably divergent in colour; these differences being imperceptible to the human eye, thus representing previously unknown morphological evolution in these species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available