4.1 Article

Microscopic morphology and size distribution of particles in PM2.5 of Guangzhou City

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 1, Pages 37-51

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10874-010-9169-7

Keywords

Atmospheric particulate; PM2.5; SEM-EDX; Size distribution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40730741]
  2. China Scholarship Council [2007U33019]
  3. Foundation of Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering [G3100033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Samples of airborne PM2.5 particles in Guangzhou urban area were collected during the autumn of 2006 and the spring of 2007. The morphologies and elemental compositions of individual particles were determined by Scanning Electron Microscopy coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (SEM-EDX). The obtained images were further analyzed for size distribution by an image analysis system. Based on the morphology, particles in PM2.5 were classified into four groups: soot aggregates, minerals, fly ash and others. The amount of soot aggregates and minerals were higher than that of fly ashes. The distributions of particles by number and size in two seasons were bimodal with 90% less than 1.0 mu m in diameter. The primary peak from the autumn samples was in the size range of 0.4 similar to 0.5 mu m, and 0.3 similar to 0.4 mu m for the spring samples. More soot aggregates (36.1%) and minerals (61.5%) were found than fly ash (2.4%) in autumn, but soot aggregates (89.9%) was the dominant particle type in spring. The size distribution of particles according to the volume was generally opposite to that according to the number. Particles less than 1.0 mu m were as high as 89.5% in number but contributed only 18.9% in volume, indicating that fine particles contributed relatively little in volume although existing in large numbers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available