4.2 Review

Three-dimensional reconstruction of heliospheric structure using iterative tomography: A review

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS
Volume 73, Issue 10, Pages 1214-1227

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2010.10.007

Keywords

Three-dimensional heliospheric density and velocity reconstructions; Solar wind flows; Interplanetary coronal mass ejections

Funding

  1. NSF [ATM-0852246, ATM0925023]
  2. NASA [NNX08AJ11G]
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) in the UK
  4. NASA [100142, NNX08AJ11G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  5. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [1053766] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [0925023, 852246] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current perspective and in-situ analyses using data from NASA's twin Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft have focused studies on ways to provide three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions of coronal and heliospheric structure. Data from STEREO are proceeded by and contemporaneous with many other types of data and analysis techniques: most of the latter have provided 3-D information by relying on remote-sensing information beyond those of the near corona (outside 10 Rs). These include combinations of past data from the Helios spacecraft and the Solwind coronagraphs and, continuing from the past to the present, from observations of interplanetary scintillation (IPS) and the Solar Mass Ejection Imager (SMEI) instrument. In this article we review past and ongoing analyses that have led to a current great wealth of 3-D information. When properly utilized, these analyses can provide not only shapes of CME/ICMEs but also a characterization of any solar wind structure or global outflow. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available