Journal
JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 11, Pages 1918-1935Publisher
AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2010JTECHO731.1
Keywords
-
Funding
- National Science Foundation [OCE0549887, OCE 0628379]
- Office of Naval Research [N00014-08-1-0446, N00014-09-1-0174, N00014-08-1-0575, N00014-08-1-0447, N00014-08-1-0577]
- Department of Defense High Performance Computing Modernization Program
- Directorate For Geosciences
- Division Of Ocean Sciences [0934737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The effects of upward buoyancy on the accuracy with which Lagrangian floats can measure the Eulerian mean variance (ww)(E) and skewness S-W(E) of vertical fluid velocity it, in the wind-driven upper-ocean boundary layer is investigated using both simulated floats in large-eddy simulation (LES) models and two float datasets. Nearly neutrally buoyant floats are repeatedly advected by the turbulent velocities across the boundary layer. Their vertical position Z is determined from pressure measurements; their W variance (WW)(F) and skewness S-W(E) are determined from the time series of float W = dZ/dt. If the float buoyancy is small, then the simulated floats measure the Eulerian velocity accurately; that is, delta W-2 = < WW >(F) - < ww >(E) and delta S-W = S-W(F) - S-W(E) are small compared to < W >(E) and S-W(E) respectively. If the floats are buoyant, and thus have an upward vertical velocity W-bias relative to the water, then delta W-2 and delta S-W can become significant. Buoyancy causes the floats to oversample both shallow depths and strong vertical velocities, leading to positive values of delta W-2 and negative values of delta S-W. The skewness S-Z(F), of depth measures the degree to which shallow depths are oversampled; it is shown to be a good predictor of W-bias/< WW >(1/2)(F), delta W-2 < WWF >, and delta S-W/S-W(F) over a wide range of float buoy-ancies and boundary layer forcings. Float data collected during two deployments confirm these results, but averaging times of several float days are typically required to obtain stable statistics. Significant differences in the magnitude of the effect may occur between datasets from different ocean forcing regimes and float designs. Other measures afloat buoyancy are also useful predictors. These results can be used to correct existing float measurements of < ww >(E) for the effects of buoyancy and also can be used as a means to operationally assess and control float buoyancy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available