3.9 Article

Star Formation Rate Indicators in Wide-Field Infrared Survey Preliminary Release

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASTROPHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 213-220

Publisher

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1007/s12036-012-9145-5

Keywords

Galaxies: star formation; galaxies: abundances; methods: data analysis; infrared: galaxies

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [10873012]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB815404]
  3. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (CUSF)
  4. Special fund for Ph.D. of North China Institute of Aerospace Engineering [KY-2010-02-B]
  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  7. National Science Foundation
  8. U.S. Department of Energy
  9. Japanese Monbukagakusho
  10. Max Planck Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the goal of investigating the degree at which the MIR luminosity in the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) traces the SFR, we analyse 3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 mu m data in a sample of similar to 140,000 star-forming galaxies or star-forming regions covering a wide range in metallicity 7.66 < 12 + log(O/H)< 9.46, with redshift z < 0.4. These star-forming galaxies or star-forming regions are selected by matching the WISE Preliminary Release Catalog with the star-forming galaxy Catalog in SDSS DR8 provided by JHU/MPA(1) . We study the relationship between the luminosity at 3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 mu m from WISE and H alpha luminosity in SDSS DR8. From these comparisons, we derive reference SFR indicators for use in our analysis. Linear correlations between SFR and the 3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 mu m luminosity are found, and calibrations of SFRs based on L(3.4), L(4.6), L(12) and L(22) are proposed. The calibrations hold for galaxies with verified spectral observations. The dispersion in the relation between 3.4, 4.6, 12 and 22 mu m luminosity and SFR relates to the galaxy's properties, such as 4000 break and galaxy color.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available