4.4 Article

Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: AMH in combination with clinical symptoms

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 213-220

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-0149-0

Keywords

AMH; PCOS; Hyperandrogenism; Oligo/amenorrhea; Rotterdam criteria; Androgen Excess Society; NIH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed the utility of using anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and clinical features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM), oligo/amenorrhea (OA), and hyperandrogenism (HA) for diagnosing PCOS, and compared their diagnostic accuracy with those of classical diagnostic systems. A total of 606 females were admitted to a university hospital with menstrual irregularities or symptoms of hyperandrogenism were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Fasting blood samples were collected. Pelvic and/or abdominal ultrasonography and clinical examination were performed. Patients were evaluated for the presence of PCOS according to conventional diagnostic criteria. The diagnostic performance of using serum AMH levels alone and in various combinations with the clinical features of PCOM, OA, and HA were investigated. For the diagnosis of PCOS, the combination of OA and/or HA with AMH showed 83 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity according to the Rotterdam criteria; 83 % sensitivity and 89 % specificity according to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria; and 82 % sensitivity and 93.5 % specificity according to the Androgen Excess Society (AES) criteria. The serum AMH level is a useful diagnostic marker for PCOS and is correlated with conventional diagnostic criteria. The combination of AMH level with OA and/or HA markedly increased the clinical scope for PCOS diagnosis and can be introduced as a possible objective criterion for the diagnosis of this disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available