4.6 Article

A framework for a personalized surgical approach to ovarian cancer

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 239-U78

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.26

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Women's Cancer Moon Shot Program
  2. NIH [P50CA083639, U54CA151668, UH2TR000943, CA016672]
  3. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP110595, RP120214]
  4. Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Program Project Development Grant
  5. Department of Defence grant [OC120547, OC093416]
  6. Judy Rees Ovarian Cancer Fund
  7. Ann Rife Cox Chair in Gynecology
  8. Betty Ann Asche Murray Distinguished Professorship
  9. Blanton-Davis Ovarian Cancer Research Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The standard approach for the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer is upfront cytoreductive surgery followed by a combination of platinum-based and taxane-based chemotherapy. The extent of residual disease following upfront cytoreductive surgery correlates with objective response to adjuvant chemotherapy, rate of pathological complete response at second-look assessment operations, and progression-free survival and overall survival. Contemporary data and metaanalyses indicate a correlation between volume of residual disease and patient outcome, with those patients undergoing complete gross resection having the best outcomes. Thus, attention has focused on surgical efforts to remove as much disease as possible with the metric of 'optimal' cytoreduction being R0 disease. Because patients with R0 resection seem to have the best overall outcomes, preoperative or intraoperative assessment to avoid unnecessary primary debulking surgery has become common. The use of serum CA-125 levels, physical examination and CT imaging have lacked accuracy in determining if disease can be optimally debulked. Therefore, an algorithm that identifies patients in whom complete gross resection at primary surgery is likely to be achieved would be expected to improve patient survival. We discuss contemporary definitions of 'optimal' residual disease, and opportunities to personalize surgical therapy and improve the quality of surgical care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available