4.2 Article

Fitness gain in a koinobiont parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) by parasitising hosts of different ages

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 83-87

Publisher

KOREAN SOC APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2011.08.011

Keywords

Reproductive fitness; Solitary; Pro-ovigenic; Brevicoryne brassicae; Host age; Body size

Categories

Funding

  1. Massey University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Host age-dependent fitness of Diaeretiella rapae was studied on cabbage aphid Brevicoryne brassicae. When given a choice of nymphs of four different ages (1, 3, 5 and 7 days), females showed a strong preference for oviposition in older nymphs, which were also the largest in the body size, and left the majority of younger nymphs unparasitised. More than 70% of offspring emerged from 5-day and 7-day old parasitised nymphs. Parasitoids develop faster in older hosts than in younger hosts. Development time of males was shorter than females in older hosts, but the development time of males and females was similar in younger hosts. The body size of adult D. rapae was positively correlated with the age of the hosts in which they developed. The sex ratio of offspring was found to be female-biased. A higher proportion of females emerged from older hosts. D. rapae females emerged from older hosts lived significantly longer. The potential fecundity of the females emerged from older (larger in body size) hosts was significantly greater than of those emerged from younger hosts with smaller bodies. Results suggest that D. rapae preferred older hosts to maximise the reproductive fitness gain. The oviposition strategy of D. rapae is discussed in the context of efficiency of this parasitoid in biological control programmes. (C) Korean Society of Applied Entomology, Taiwan Entomological Society and Malaysian Plant Protection Society, 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available