4.2 Article

Monitoring for insecticide resistance in field-collected populations of Blattella germanica (Blattaria: Blattellidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 309-312

Publisher

KOREAN SOC APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2010.05.008

Keywords

Blattella germanica; German cockroach; insecticide resistance; resistance monitoring

Categories

Funding

  1. Korea National Institute of Health
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Korean Government [R31-10056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seven field-collected populations of German cockroach, Blattella germanica (L.) (ICN, DNH, CHN, DGU, BSN, GSN, and GWJ), were tested for susceptibility to eight different insecticides by a topical application method, and were compared to an insecticide-susceptible KSS strain. Marked regional variations of insecticide susceptibility were observed. Extremely high to high levels of resistance were observed in bifenthrin [resistance ratio (RR), 46-159], deltamethrin (RR, 61-160), and esfenvalerate [RR, 70-270; except for BSN females (RR, 20) and GSN females (RR, 24)]. Low to moderate levels of resistance were observed in cypermethrin [RR, 16-29; except for DGU females (RR, 88) and BSN females (RR, 41)], permethrin ERR, 11-39; except for DNH females (RR, 110) and BSN females (RR, 44)], chlorpyrifos [RR, 2-13; except for GSN and GWJ females (RR, ca. 140)], chlorpyrifos-methyl (RR, 2-8), and fenthion (RR, 8-17). All of the colonies were susceptible to one or more of the insecticides examined. These results indicate that careful selection and rotational use of these insecticides should result in continued satisfactory control against field populations of German cockroach. (C) Korean Society of Applied Entomology, Taiwan Entomological Society and Malaysian Plant Protection Society, 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available