4.6 Article

Patients Prefer A Bicruciate-Retaining or the Medial Pivot Total Knee Prosthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 224-228

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.012

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty; bilateral total knee arthroplasty

Categories

Funding

  1. Wright Medical Technology (Arlington, Tenn)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four-hundred forty patients underwent staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty using a different prosthesis on each side. Prostheses used were anterior-posterior cruciate-retaining (ACL-PCL), posterior cruciate-retaining (PCL), Medial Pivot (MP), posterior cruciate-substituting (PS), and mobile bearing (MB). At the 2-year evaluation, we asked Which is your better knee overall? Responses were as follows: 89.1% preferred the ACL-PCL to the PS and 76.2% preferred the MP to the PS. The ACL-PCL and the MP were preferred equally. The MP was preferred over the PCL by 76.0%, and 61.4% preferred the MP over the MB. The PS and PCL were preferred equally. Range of motion, pain relief, alignment, and stability did not vary significantly by prosthesis used. Patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasties preferred retention of both cruciates with use of the ACL-PCL prosthesis or substituting with an MP prosthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available