4.6 Article

Differences of Knee Anthropometry Between Chinese and White Men and Women

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 124-130

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.11.020

Keywords

knee geometry; total knee arthroplasty; Chinese; Caucasian; male; female

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-AR052408, R21-AR05107]
  2. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund [09dz2200400]
  3. Program for Shanghai Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Implant [08DZ2230330]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901517]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR052408, R21AR051078] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whether there are differences in knee anthropometry between Asian and white knees remains unclear. Three-dimensional knee models were constructed using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of healthy Chinese and white subjects. The morphologic measurements of the femur included mediolateral, anteroposterior dimensions, and aspect ratio. The tibial measurements included mediolateral, medial/lateral anteroposterior dimension, aspect ratio, and posterior slope of medial/lateral plateau. The results showed that Chinese knees were generally smaller than white knees. In addition, the femoral aspect ratio of Chinese females was significantly smaller than that of white females (1.24 +/- 0.04 vs 1.28 +/- 0.06). Tibial aspect ratio differences between Chinese and white males (1.82 +/- 0.07 vs 1.75 +/- 0.11), though significant, were likely a reflection of differences in knee size between races. These racial differences should be considered in the design of total knee arthroplasty prosthesis for Asian population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available