4.7 Article

Scalable synthesis and post-modification of a mesoporous metal-organic framework called NU-1000

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 149-162

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2016.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Inorganometallic Catalyst Design Center, an Energy Frontier Research Center - US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DESC0012702]
  2. Joint Center of Excellence in Integrated Nano-Systems (JCIN) at King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) [34-944]
  3. Northwestern University (NU)
  4. KACST
  5. NU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis of NUNU-1000, a highly robust mesoporous (containing pores >2 nm) metal-organic framework (MOF), can be conducted efficiently on a multigram scale from inexpensive starting materials. Tetrabromopyrene and (4-(ethoxycarbonyl) phenyl) boronic acid can easily be coupled to prepare the requisite organic strut with four metal-binding sites in the form of four carboxylic acids, while zirconyl chloride octahydrate is used as a precursor for the well-defined metal oxide clusters. NUNU-1000 has been reported as an excellent candidate for the separation of gases, and it is a versatile scaffold for heterogeneous catalysis. In particular, it is ideal for the catalytic deactivation of nerve agents, and it shows great promise as a new generic platform for a wide range of applications. Multiple post-synthetic modification protocols have been developed using NUNU-1000 as the parent material, making it a potentially useful scaffold for several catalytic applications. The procedure for the preparation of NUNU-1000 can be scaled up reliably, and it is suitable for the production of 50 g of the tetracarboxylic acid containing organic linker and 200 mg-2.5 g of NUNU-1000. The entire synthesis is performed without purification by column chromatography and can be completed within 10 d.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available