4.7 Article

Enhancer scanning to locate regulatory regions in genomic loci

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 46-60

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.136

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Genetic Association and Mechanisms in Oncology (GAME-ON) through National Cancer Institute (NCI) U19 award [CA148112]
  2. Ovarian Cancer Research Foundation [258807]
  3. Phi Beta Psi Foundation
  4. Molecular Genomics Core Facilities at the Moffitt Cancer Center through its NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30-CA76292]
  5. Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award [F31 CA165528]
  6. NIH R25T award [CA147832]
  7. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

his protocol provides a rapid, streamlined and scalable strategy to systematically scan genomic regions for the presence of transcriptional regulatory regions that are active in a specific cell type. It creates genomic tiles spanning a region of interest that are subsequently cloned by recombination into a luciferase reporter vector containing the simian virus 40 promoter. Tiling clones are transfected into specific cell types to test for the presence of transcriptional regulatory regions. The protocol includes testing of different single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alleles to determine their effect on regulatory activity. This procedure provides a systematic framework for identifying candidate functional SNPs within a locus during functional analysis of genome-wide association studies. This protocol adapts and combines previous well-established molecular biology methods to provide a streamlined strategy, based on automated primer design and recombinational cloning, allowing one to rapidly go from a genomic locus to a set of candidate functional SNPs in 8 weeks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available