4.7 Article

Analysis of resistance and tolerance to virus infection in Drosophila

Journal

NATURE PROTOCOLS
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages 1084-1097

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2015.071

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences
  2. Excellent Chemisch Onderzoek (ECHO) project [711.013.001]
  3. Open Program of the Division for Earth and Life Sciences from the Netherlands organization for scientific research (NWO) [821.02.028]
  4. European Research Council consolidator grant under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (ERC) [615680]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [615680] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Host defense to virus infection involves both resistance mechanisms that reduce viral burden and tolerance mechanisms that limit detrimental effects of infection. The fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has emerged as a model for identifying and characterizing the genetic basis of resistance and tolerance. This protocol describes how to analyze host responses to virus infection in Drosophila, and it covers the preparation of virus stocks, experimental inoculation of flies and assessment of host survival and virus production, which are indicative of resistance or tolerance. It also provides guidance on how to account for recently identified confounding factors, including natural genetic variation in the pastrel locus and contamination of fly stocks with persistent viruses and the symbiotic bacterium Wolbachia. Our protocol aims to be accessible to newcomers to the field and, although optimized for virus research using Drosophila, some of the techniques could be adapted to other host organisms and/or other microbial pathogens. Preparation of fly stocks requires similar to 1 month, virus stock preparation requires 17-20 d, virus injection and survival assays require 10-15 d and virus titration requires 14 d.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available