4.5 Article

Errors in LiDAR-derived shrub height and crown area on sloped terrain

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
Volume 75, Issue 4, Pages 377-382

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.11.005

Keywords

Biomass; Canopy projection; Elliptical crown area; Hillslope; Laser altimetry; Light detection and ranging; Remote sensing; Sagebrush; Shrub-steppe

Funding

  1. NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Division [NA06OAR4600124]
  2. NSF Idaho
  3. National Science Foundation [EPS-0814387]
  4. BLM Owyhee Uplands Pilot Project (ISU-BLM) [DLA060249]
  5. BLM Owyhee Uplands Pilot Project (ARS-BLM) [60-5362-54820]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed and tested four methods for shrub height measurements with airborne LiDAR data in a semiarid shrub-steppe in southwestern Idaho, USA. Unique to this study was the focus of sagebrush height measurements on sloped terrain. The study also developed one of the first methods towards estimating crown area of sagebrush from LiDAR. Both sagebrush height and crown area were underestimated by LiDAR. Sagebrush height was estimated to within +/- 0.26-0.32 mm (two standard deviations of standard error). Crown area was underestimated by a mean of 49%. Further, hillslope had a relatively low impact on sagebrush height and crown area estimation. From a management perspective, estimation of individual shrubs over large geographic areas can be accomplished using a 0.5 m rasterized vegetation height derivative from LiDAR. While the underestimation of crown area is substantial, we suggest that this underestimation would improve with higher LiDAR point density (>4 points/m(2)). Further studies can estimate shrub biomass using LiDAR height and crown area derivatives. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available