4.5 Article

On the origins of extractive metallurgy: new evidence from Europe

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 2775-2787

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.06.012

Keywords

Copper metallurgy; Smelting; Copper slag; Malachite; Bead; Vinca culture; Belovode; Serbia; Balkans; Eurasia; Chalcolithic; Lead-isotope ratios; Trace element analysis

Funding

  1. European Union [MEST-CT-2004-514509]
  2. Tokyo Foundation
  3. Republic of Serbia (Fund for Young Talents, Ministries of Science and of Culture)
  4. EPSRC
  5. OSI-Soros Foundation
  6. Exit Foundation
  7. Freeport McMoRan
  8. IAMS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The beginnings of extractive metallurgy in Eurasia are contentious. The first cast copper objects in this region emerge c. 7000 years ago, and their production has been tentatively linked to centres in the Near East. This assumption, however, is not substantiated by evidence for copper smelting in those centres. Here, we present results from recent excavations from Belovode, a Vinca culture site in Eastern Serbia, which has provided the earliest direct evidence for copper smelting to date. The earliest copper smelting activities there took place c. 7000 years ago, contemporary with the emergence of the first cast copper objects. Through optical, chemical and provenance analyses of copper slag, minerals, ores and artefacts, we demonstrate the presence of an established metallurgical technology during this period, exploiting multiple sources for raw materials. These results extend the known record of copper smelting by more than half a millennium, with substantial implications. Extractive metallurgy occurs at a location far away from the Near East, challenging the traditional model of a single origin of metallurgy and reviving the possibility of multiple, independent inventions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available