4.5 Review

Assessment of material characteristics of ancient concretes, Grande Aula, Markets of Trajan, Rome

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 11, Pages 2481-2492

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.07.011

Keywords

Ancient Rome; Concrete; Pozzolanic mortar; Stratlingite; Tensile strength; Point load tests

Funding

  1. Istituto Nazionale di Vulcanologia e Geofisica in Rome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Grande Aula, or Great Hall, of the Markets of Trajan (AD 96 to 115) is an intact example of the domed, concrete architecture of imperial Rome. Petrographic, x-ray diffraction, chemical, and SEM analyses demonstrate that wall mortars contain Pozzolane Rosse volcanic ash aggregate (harenae fossiciae) and stratlingite, a complex calcium aluminate cement hydrate (C-2 ASH(8)) that gives modern cements good durability and compressive strength. Specific gravity tests and a new petrographic method for assessing bulk densities indicate unit weights of about 1750 kg/m(3) for the wall mortars and 1430-1640 kg/m(3) for the pumice bearing, vaulted ceiling mortars. Innovative point load source tests record the tensile strengths (f(t)) of the aggregate and interfacial elements of the conglomeratic concrete fabric. These suggest f(t) of about 2.7 MPa for brick, 1.2 MPa for Tufo Lionato tuff, and 0.9 MPa for Tufo Giallo della Via Tiberina tuff coarse aggregate (caementa), based on a tentative, approximate correlation with splitting (Brazilian) tests. The pozzolanic mortar and interfacial zones have lower f(t) in the range of 0.8 MPa to 0.5 MPa. The relatively low mortar strength and its somewhat tenuous adhesion to the coarse aggregate suggests that the caementa may have arrested the propagation of tensile microcracks that formed in the mortar, thereby increasing the composite tensile strength of the concrete. Roman builders selected the complex aggregate mixes to optimize the performance of the wall and vault concretes. (c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available