4.5 Article

Quantitative micromorphological analyses of cut marks produced by ancient and modern handaxes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 1869-1880

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2009.04.014

Keywords

Cut marks; Boxgrove; Butchery experiment; Homo heidelbergensis; Handaxe; Carcase processing

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/E015905/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/E015905/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we analyse the three-dimensional micromorphology of cut marks on fossil mammal remains from a similar to 0.5 million year old Acheulean butchery site at Boxgrove (West Sussex, southern England), and make comparisons with cut marks inflicted during the experimental butchery of a roe deer (Capreolus caproelus) using a replica handaxe. Morphological attributes of the cut marks were measured using an Alicona imaging microscope, a novel optical technique that generates three-dimensional virtual reconstructions of surface features. The study shows that high-resolution measurements of cut marks can shed light on aspects of butchery techniques, tool use and the behavioural repertoire of Lower Palaeolithic hominins. Differences between the experimental cut marks and those on the Boxgrove large mammal bones suggest variation in the angle of the cuts and greater forces used in the butchery of the larger (rhinoceros-sized) carcasses at Boxgrove. Tool-edge characteristics may account for some of these differences, but the greater robusticity of the Boxgrove hominins (attributed to Homo heidelbergensis) may be a factor in the greater forces indicated by some of the cut marks on the Boxgrove specimens. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available