4.5 Article

Changing growing conditions for crops during the Near Eastern Bronze Age (3000-1200 BC): the stable carbon isotope evidence

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCIENCE
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1011-1022

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2007.07.003

Keywords

ancient agriculture; climate change; drought-stress; Levant; Mesopotamia; cereals; carbon isotope discrimination (Delta C-13)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The analysis of carbon isotope discrimination (Delta C-13) in crop plant remains from seven Bronze Age sites in northern Mesopotamia and the Levant shows clear differences in water availability between the different geographic areas and throughout the different periods (3000-1200 BC). Amongst the different moisture variables modelled precipitation minus evaporation (P-E-using a macrophysical climate model (MCM)) results in very high correlation (0.74) with Delta C-13 values in barley, supporting the significance of climate parameters (effective moisture) in carbon fixation in this species. The comparison of Delta C-13 values of different crops in different periods confirms increased aridity during the Middle Bronze Age (2000-1600 BC), compared to the later Early Bronze Age (2700-2000 BC) particularly in the north-eastern Syrian territory with generally lower Delta C-13 values during the Middle Bronze Age, as has been documented in palaeoclimate proxies, and in agreement with the MCM. Standard deviation in Delta C-13 values from grains or seeds of one species originating from different samples of an individual site may be understood as variability in moisture conditions during the grain-filling period around the considered location. Large standard deviations occur preferably in sites with low mean annual precipitation (e.g. at Emar) and suggest that in these sites, at least some of the crops were irrigated. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available