4.5 Article

DNA damage in brain cells and behavioral deficits in mice after treatment with high doses of amantadine

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 8, Pages 745-753

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jat.1550

Keywords

amantadine; behavior; comet assay; memory; micronucleus assay; toxicity

Categories

Funding

  1. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)
  2. FAPERGS (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul)
  3. ISB, Brazil
  4. PIBIC/CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amantadine (AMA) is an uncompetitive antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, with clinical application,acting on treatment of influenza A virus and Parkinson's disease. It has been proposed that AMA can indirectly modulate dopaminergic transmission. In high doses, the central nervous system is its primary site of toxicity. To examine deleterious effects on CNS induced by AMA, this study evaluated possible neurobehavioral alterations induced by AMA such as stereotyped behavior, the effects on locomotion and memory and its possible genotoxic/mutagenic activities. Adult male CF-1 mice were treated with a systemic injection of AMA (15, 30 or 60 mg kg(-1)) 20 min before behavioral tasks on open field and inhibitory avoidance. Higher AMA doses increased the latency to step-down inhibitory avoidance test in the training session in the inhibitory avoidance task. At 60 mg kg(-1) AMA induced impairing effects on locomotion and exploration and hence impaired habituation to a novel environment. Stereotyped behavior after each administration in a 3-day trial was observed, suggesting effects on dopaminergic system. Amantadine was not able to induce chromosomal mutagenesis or toxicity on bone marrow, as evaluated by the micronucleus assay. At the lowest dose tested, AMA did not induce DNA damage and it was unable to impair memory, locomotion, exploration or motivation in mice. However, higher AMA doses increased DNA damage in brain tissue, produced locomotor disturbances severe enough to preclude testing for learning and memory effects, and induced stereotypy, suggesting neurotoxicity. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available