4.7 Article

Neuronal pattern separation in the olfactory bulb improves odor discrimination learning

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages 1474-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nn.4089

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of Geneva
  2. Geneva neuroscience center
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_153410, CR33I13_143723, 310030E_135910]
  4. National Center of Competence in Research (NCCR) 'SYNAPSY - The Synaptic Bases of Mental Diseases' - Swiss National Science Foundation [51AU40_125759]
  5. European Research Council [ERC-2009-StG-243344-NEUROCHEMS]
  6. European Molecular Biology Organization
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030E-135910, 31003A_153410] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuronal pattern separation is thought to enable the brain to disambiguate sensory stimuli with overlapping features, thereby extracting valuable information. In the olfactory system, it remains unknown whether pattern separation acts as a driving force for sensory discrimination and the learning thereof. We found that overlapping odor-evoked input patterns to the mouse olfactory bulb (OB) were dynamically reformatted in the network on the timescale of a single breath, giving rise to separated patterns of activity in an ensemble of output neurons, mitral/tufted (M/T) cells. Notably, the extent of pattern separation in M/T assemblies predicted behavioral discrimination performance during the learning phase. Furthermore, exciting or inhibiting GABAergic OB interneurons, using optogenetics or pharmacogenetics, altered pattern separation and thereby odor discrimination learning in a bidirectional way. In conclusion, we propose that the OB network can act as a pattern separator facilitating olfactory stimulus distinction, a process that is sculpted by synaptic inhibition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available