4.7 Article

Determinants of different deep and superficial CA1 pyramidal cell dynamics during sharp-wave ripples

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages 1281-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nn.4074

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BFU2012-37156-C03-01]
  2. CSIC JAE Program
  3. European Social Fund
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports [FPU12/03776, BES-2013-064171]
  5. MRC Anatomical Neuropharmacological Unit in Oxford [FPU-EST13/01046]
  6. Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  7. UK Medical Research Council
  8. ERC Advanced grant (INTERIMPACT)
  9. MRC [MC_UU_12024/4, MC_UU_12020/3] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12020/3, MC_UU_12024/4] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sharp-wave ripples represent a prominent synchronous activity pattern in the mammalian hippocampus during sleep and immobility. GABAergic interneuronal types are silenced or fire during these events, but the mechanism of pyramidal cell (PC) participation remains elusive. We found opposite membrane polarization of deep (closer to stratum oriens) and superficial (closer to stratum radiatum) rat CA1 PCs during sharp-wave ripples. Using sharp and multi-site recordings in combination with neurochemical profiling, we observed a predominant inhibitory drive of deep calbindin (CB)-immunonegative PCs that contrasts with a prominent depolarization of superficial CB-immunopositive PCs. Biased contribution of perisomatic GABAergic inputs, together with suppression of CA2 PCs, may explain the selection of CA1 PCs during sharp-wave ripples. A deep-superficial gradient interacted with behavioral and spatial effects to determine cell participation during sleep and awake sharp-wave ripples in freely moving rats. Thus, the firing dynamics of hippocampal PCs are exquisitely controlled at subcellular and microcircuit levels in a cell type-selective manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available