4.7 Article

Analysis of the Structure and Function of FOX-4 Cephamycinase

Journal

ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 717-728

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01887-15

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. HHS \ National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AI100560, AI063517, GM094662, 1S10RR029398, 1S10RR019352]
  2. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) [BX001974]
  3. DOE \ Argonne National Laboratory, Office of Science (ANL) [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Class C beta-lactamases poorly hydrolyze cephamycins (e.g., cefoxitin, cefotetan, and moxalactam). In the past 2 decades, a new family of plasmid-based AmpC beta-lactamases conferring resistance to cefoxitin, the FOX family, has grown to include nine unique members descended from the Aeromonas caviae chromosomal AmpC. To understand the basis for the unique cephamycinase activity in the FOX family, we determined the first X-ray crystal structures of FOX-4, apo enzyme and the acyl-enzyme with its namesake compound, cefoxitin, using the Y150F deacylation-deficient variant. Notably, recombinant expression of N-terminally tagged FOX-4 also yielded an inactive adenylylated enzyme form not previously observed in beta-lactamases. The post-translational modification (PTM), which occurs on the active site Ser64, would not seem to provide a selective advantage, yet might present an opportunity for the design of novel antibacterial drugs. Substantial ligand-induced changes in the enzyme are seen in the acyl-enzyme complex, particularly the R2 loop and helix H10 (P289 to N297), with movement of F293 by 10.3 angstrom. Taken together, this study provides the first picture of this highly proficient class C cephamycinase, uncovers a novel PTM, and suggests a possible cephamycin resistance mechanism involving repositioning of the substrate due to the presence of S153P, N289P, and N346I substitutions in the ligand binding pocket.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available