4.3 Article

Estimating aboveground biomass in Avicennia marina plantation in Indian Sundarbans using high-resolution satellite data

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPIE-SOC PHOTO-OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1117/1.JRS.8.083638

Keywords

aboveground biomass; Avicennia marina; normalized difference vegetation index; optimized soil adjusted vegetation index; transformed difference vegetation index; Sundarbans

Funding

  1. National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), Department of Space, Government of India
  2. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mangroves are active carbon sequesters playing a crucial role in coastal ecosystems. In the present study, aboveground biomass (AGB) was estimated in a 5-year-old Avicennia marina plantation (approximate area approximate to 190 ha) of Indian Sundarbans using high-resolution satellite data in order to assess its carbon sequestration potential. The reflectance values of each band of LISS IV satellite data and the vegetation indices, viz., normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), optimized soil adjusted vegetation index (OSAVI), and transformed difference vegetation index (TDVI), derived from the satellite data, were correlated with the AGB. OSAVI showed the strongest positive linear relationship with the AGB and hence carbon content of the stand. OSAVI was found to predict the AGB to a great extent (r(2) = 0.72) as it is known to nullify the background soil reflectance effect added to vegetation reflectance. The total AGB of the entire plantation was estimated to be 236 metric tons having a carbon stock of 54.9 metric tons, sequestered within a time span of 5 years. Integration of this technique for monitoring and management of young mangrove plantations will give time and cost effective results. (C) 2014 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available