4.8 Article

Subclonal diversification of primary breast cancer revealed by multiregion sequencing

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 751-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.3886

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [077012/Z/05/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust Intermediate Clinical Research Fellowship [WT100183MA]
  3. Belgian Cancer Plan-Ministry of Health
  4. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  5. Brussels Region
  6. Norwegian Cancer Society
  7. Norwegian Health Region West
  8. Bergen Research Foundation
  9. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) [242006]
  10. Institut National du Cancer (INCa)
  11. National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy
  12. The Francis Crick Institute [10202] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sequencing of cancer genomes may enable tailoring of therapeutics to the underlying biological abnormalities driving a particular patient's tumor. However, sequencing-based strategies rely heavily on representative sampling of tumors. To understand the subclonal structure of primary breast cancer, we applied whole-genome and targeted sequencing to multiple samples from each of 50 patients' tumors (303 samples in total). The extent of subclonal diversification varied among cases and followed spatial patterns. No strict temporal order was evident, with point mutations and rearrangements affecting the most common breast cancer genes, including PIK3CA, TP53, PTEN, BRCA2 and MYC, occurring early in some tumors and late in others. In 13 out of 50 cancers, potentially targetable mutations were subclonal. Landmarks of disease progression, such as resistance to chemotherapy and the acquisition of invasive or metastatic potential, arose within detectable subclones of antecedent lesions. These findings highlight the importance of including analyses of subclonal structure and tumor evolution in clinical trials of primary breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available