4.8 Article

Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 256-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.3802

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. research program of the Project for Development of Innovative Research on Cancer Therapeutics (P-Direct)
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  3. Research Grant of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25253080, 25670570, 15K19349] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human colorectal tumors bear recurrent mutations in genes encoding proteins operative in the WNT, MAPK, TGF-beta, TP53 and PI3K pathways(1,2). Although these pathways influence intestinal stem cell niche signaling(3-5), the extent to which mutations in these pathways contribute to human colorectal carcinogenesis remains unclear. Here we use the CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing system(6,7) to introduce multiple such mutations into organoids derived from normal human intestinal epithelium. By modulating the culture conditions to mimic that of the intestinal niche, we selected isogenic organoids harboring mutations in the tumor suppressor genes APC, SMAD4 and TP53, and in the oncogenes KRAS and/or PIK3CA. Organoids engineered to express all five mutations grew independently of niche factors in vitro, and they formed tumors after implantation under the kidney subcapsule in mice. Although they formed micrometastases containing dormant tumor-initiating cells after injection into the spleen of mice, they failed to colonize in the liver. In contrast, engineered organoids derived from chromosome-instable human adenomas formed macrometastatic colonies. These results suggest that 'driver' pathway mutations enable stem cell maintenance in the hostile tumor microenvironment, but that additional molecular lesions are required for invasive behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available