4.6 Article

Cellulose nanofibres and cellulose nanowhiskers based natural rubber composites: Diffusion, sorption, and permeation of aromatic organic solvents

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages 1614-1623

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.35176

Keywords

cellulose nanowhiskers; cellulose nanofibers; diffusion coefficient; sorption coefficient and permeation coefficient

Funding

  1. SIDA [348-2008-6040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates the transport behavior of three aromatic organic solvents, viz. benzene, toluene, and p-xylene in natural rubber nanocomposite membranes containing cellulose nanofibres (CNFs) and cellulose nanowhiskers (CNWs) isolated from bamboo pulp. The solvent molecules act as molecular probes to study the diffusion, sorption, and permeation through the nanocomposites, and provide information on the nanocomposite structure and matrixfiller interactions. Both the nanocelluloses were found to decrease the uptake of aromatic solvents in nanocomposite membranes, but the effect was more significant in the case on nanofibers compared to nanowhiskers. Furthermore, the uptake decreased with increased penetrant size; being the highest for benzene and the lowest for p-xylene. Transport parameters such as diffusion coefficient, sorption coefficient, and permeation coefficient have been calculated. Comparison of the experimental values of equilibrium solvent uptake with the predicted values indicated that both the nanocelluloses have restricted the molecular mobility at the interphase and thereby decreased the transport of solvents through the materials; being more significant for nanofibers. The results showed that both the used cellulosic nanomaterials act as functional additives capable of manipulating and tailoring the transport of organic solvents through elastomeric membranes, even at concentrations as low as 2.5 wt %. (C) 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available