4.8 Article

Evolution of metastasis revealed by mutational landscapes of chemically induced skin cancers

Journal

NATURE MEDICINE
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages 1514-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.3979

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Cancer Institute (NCI) [UO1 CA84244, UO1 CA141455, UO1 CA176287, RO1CA184510]
  2. Barbara Bass Bakar Distinguished Professorship in Cancer Genetics
  3. US National Institutes of Health training grant [T32 GM007175]
  4. NCI F31 National Research Service Award
  5. Cancer Research UK
  6. Wellcome Trust
  7. Cancer Research UK [13031] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human tumors show a high level of genetic heterogeneity, but the processes that influence the timing and route of metastatic dissemination of the subclones are unknown. Here we have used whole-exome sequencing of 103 matched benign, malignant and metastatic skin tumors from genetically heterogeneous mice to demonstrate that most metastases disseminate synchronously from the primary tumor, supporting parallel rather than linear evolution as the predominant model of metastasis. Shared mutations between primary carcinomas and their matched metastases have the distinct A-to-T signature of the initiating carcinogen dimethylbenzanthracene, but non-shared mutations are primarily G-to-T, a signature associated with oxidative stress. The existence of carcinomas that either did or did not metastasize in the same host animal suggests that there are tumor-intrinsic factors that influence metastatic seeding. We also demonstrate the importance of germline polymorphisms in determining allele-specific mutations, and we identify somatic genetic alterations that are specifically related to initiation of carcinogenesis by Hras or Kras mutations. Mouse tumors that mimic the genetic heterogeneity of human cancers can aid our understanding of the clonal evolution of metastasis and provide a realistic model for the testing of novel therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available