4.8 Article

Destruction of chemical warfare agents using metal-organic frameworks

Journal

NATURE MATERIALS
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 512-516

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4238

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DTRA [HDTRA-1-10-0023]
  2. US DOE, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-FG02-12ER16362]
  3. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC)
  4. Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical Biological Defense (JSTO-CBD) [BA13PHM210]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemical warfare agents containing phosphonate ester bonds are among the most toxic chemicals known to mankind(1). Recent global military events, such as the conflict and disarmament in Syria(2), have brought into focus the need to find effective strategies for the rapid destruction of these banned chemicals. Solutions are needed for immediate personal protection (for example, the filtration and catalytic destruction of airborne versions of agents), bulk destruction of chemical weapon stockpiles, protection (via coating) of clothing, equipment and buildings, and containment of agent spills(3). Solid heterogeneous materials such as modified activated carbon or metal oxides exhibit many desirable characteristics for the destruction of chemical warfare agents(4-6). However, low sorptive capacities, low effective active site loadings, deactivation of the active site, slow degradation kinetics, and/or a lack of tailorability offer significant room for improvement in these materials. Here, we report a carefully chosen metal-organic framework (MOF) material featuring high porosity and exceptional chemical stability that is extraordinarily effective for the degradation of nerve agents and their simulants. Experimental and computational evidence points to Lewis-acidic Zr-IV ions as the active sites and to their superb accessibility as a defining element of their efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available