4.6 Article

Influence of the Filler Type on the Rupture Behavior of Filled Elastomers

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 118, Issue 1, Pages 435-445

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.31606

Keywords

silica; carbon black; fracture; crack; elastomer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work is devoted to the rupture behavior of elastomers filled with carbon black (CB) or silica. Two elastomers have been studied: one which crystallizes under strain, natural rubber (NR), and another one which does not crystallize, styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). The study of the crack propagation of Single Edge Notched specimen (SENT) during stretching at different speeds focuses on the crack initiation and crack deviation phenomenon. This deviation is of main importance in the materials crack resistance as it leads to a large increase in the energy needed for rupture. The deviation in filled or unfilled NR is controlled by crystallization, which is a slow process. In unfilled SBR, deviation is controlled by polymer chain orientation, which is hindered by relaxation mechanisms. The introduction of fillers promotes strain amplification, and strain anisotropy in the crack tip region of the notched samples, and therefore crack deviation. In term of energy density at break of the SBR composites, the SBR filled with silica treated with a covering agent is the most efficient. Thus, a weak interface between the silica and SBR promotes better rupture properties. When comparing Silica and CB filled NR, the highest strain energy to rupture is also obtained with silica. This might be due to the weaker filler-matrix interface for silica. Thus, these results evidence the kinetic aspect of the rupture, and of the mechanisms it involves: the polymer relaxation, the crystallization (for NR), and the filler-matrix interaction and decohesion, all of them being strongly interrelated. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 118: 435-445, 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available