4.6 Article

Influence of a Novel β-Nucleating Agent on the Structure, Morphology, and Nonisothermal Crystallization Behavior of Isotactic Polypropylene

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 1076-1085

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.29139

Keywords

crystallization; nucleation; poly(propylene) (PP)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50673021]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [G2005CB623803]
  3. Hi-Tech Research & Development Program of China [2007AA03Z450]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai [06ZR14007]
  5. Guangdong Province National Ministry of Education Special Funds [2007A090302091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystalline structure, morphology, and nonisothermal crystallization behavior of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) with and without a novel rare earth-containing beta-nucleating agent (WBG) were investigated with wide-angle X-ray diffraction, polar optical microscopy, and differential scanning calorimetry. WBG Could induce the formation of the form, and a higher proportion of the beta form could be obtained by the combined effect of the optimum WBG concentration and a lower cooling rate. The content of the form Could reach more than 0.90 in a 0.08 wt % WBG nucleated sample at cooling rates lower than 5 degrees C/min. Polar optical microscopy showed that WBG led to substantial changes in both the morphological development and crystallization process of iPP. At all the studied cooling rates, the temperature at which the maximum rate of crystallization occurred was increased by 8-11 degrees C in the presence of the nucleating agent. An analysis of the nonisothermal crystallization kinetics also revealed that the introduction of WBG significantly shortened both the apparent incubation period for crystallization and the overall crystallization time. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 111: 1076-1085, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available