4.6 Article

Effects of Starch Nanocrystal-graft-Polycaprolactone on Mechanical Properties of Waterborne Polyurethane-Based Nanocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 619-627

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/app.29060

Keywords

waterborne polyurethane; starch nanocrystals; graft; nanocomposite; mechanical properties; structure-properties relationship

Funding

  1. Agricultural Bioproducts Innovation Program (ABIP) of Canada
  2. Youth Chenguang Program of Science & Technology in Wuhan [200850731383]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Physics and Chemistry (Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences [LCLC-2005-172, LCLC-2008-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on a graft from strategy, the surface of starch nanocrystals (StN) were functionalized by grafting with polycaprolactone (PCL) chains via microwave assisted ring-opening polymerization (ROP). The modified natural nanoparticles were then compounded into a PCL-based waterborne polyurethane as matrix. The structural and mechanical properties of the WPU/StN-g-PCL nanocomposites were characterized by XRD, FTIR, SEM, DSC, DMA, and tensile testing. It was interesting to note that a loading-level of 5 wt % StN-g-PCL resulted in a simultaneous enhancement of tensile strength and elongation at break, both of which were higher than those of neat WPU. This enhancement was attributed to the uniform dispersion of StN-g-PCL because of its nano-scale size, the increased entanglements mediated with grafted PCL chains, and the reinforcing function of rigid StN. Increasing the StN-g-PCL content however caused the StN-g-PCL to self-aggregate as crystalline domains, which impeded improvement in tensile strength and elongation at break, but significantly enhanced Young's modulus. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 111: 619-627, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available