4.5 Article

A simplified method for determining phenotypic traits in patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 114, Issue 7, Pages 911-922

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2012

Keywords

pathophysiology of sleep apnea; loop gain; pharyngeal critical closing pressure; upper airway; arousal threshold

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [5R01 HL-048531-16, R01 HL-085188, R01 HL-090897, R01 HL-102321, K24-HL-093218, P01 HL-095491]
  2. American Heart Association [0840159N, 0575028N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simplified method for determining phenotypic traits in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. J Appl Physiol 114: 911-922, 2013. First published January 24, 2013; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00747.2012.-We previously published a method for measuring several physiological traits causing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The method, however, had a relatively low success rate (76%) and required mathematical modeling, potentially limiting its application. This paper presents a substantial revision of that technique. To make the measurements, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was manipulated during sleep to quantify 1) eupneic ventilatory demand, 2) the level of ventilation at which arousals begin to occur, 3) ventilation off CPAP (nasal pressure = 0 cmH(2)O) when the pharyngeal muscles are activated during sleep, and 4) ventilation off CPAP when the pharyngeal muscles are relatively passive. These traits could be determined in all 13 participants (100% success rate). There was substantial intersubject variability in the reduction in ventilation that individuals could tolerate before having arousals (difference between ventilations #1 and #2 ranged from 0.7 to 2.9 liters/min) and in the amount of ventilatory compensation that individuals could generate (difference between ventilations #3 and #4 ranged from -0.5 to 5.5 liters/min). Importantly, the measurements accurately reflected clinical metrics; the difference between ventilations #2 and #3, a measure of the gap that must be overcome to achieve stable breathing during sleep, correlated with the apnea-hypopnea index (r = 0.9, P < 0.001). An additional procedure was added to the technique to measure loop gain (sensitivity of the ventilatory control system), which allowed arousal threshold and upper airway gain (response of the upper airway to increasing ventilatory drive) to be quantified as well. Of note, the traits were generally repeatable when measured on a second night in 5 individuals. This technique is a relatively simple way of defining mechanisms underlying OSA and could potentially be used in a clinical setting to individualize therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available