4.5 Article

Spontaneous fluctuations in cerebral blood flow regulation: contribution of PaCO2

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 1860-1868

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00857.2010

Keywords

aging; CO2 reactivity; hypercapnia; nonstationarity; arterial PCO2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Panerai RB, Dineen NE, Brodie FG, Robinson TG. Spontaneous fluctuations in cerebral blood flow regulation: contribution of Pa-CO2. J Appl Physiol 109: 1860-1868, 2010. First published September 30, 2010; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00857.2010.-To investigate the temporal variability of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA), the transient response of cerebral blood flow to rapid changes in arterial blood pressure, a new approach was introduced to improve the temporal resolution of dynamic CA assessment. Continuous bilateral recordings of cerebral blood flow velocity (transcranial Doppler, middle cerebral artery), end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2, infrared capnograph), and blood pressure (Finapres) were obtained at rest and during breath hold in 30 young subjects (25 +/- 6 yr old) and 30 older subjects (64 +/- 4 yr old). Time-varying estimates of the autoregulation index [ARI(t)] were obtained with an autoregressive-moving average model with coefficients expanded by orthogonal decomposition. The temporal pattern of ARI(t) varied inversely with PETCO2, decreasing with hypercapnia. At rest, ARI(t) showed spontaneous fluctuations that were significantly different from noise and significantly correlated with spontaneous fluctuations in PETCO2 in the majority of recordings (young: 72% and old: 65%). No significant differences were found in ARI(t) due to aging. This new approach to improve the temporal resolution of dynamic CA parameters allows the identification of physiologically meaningful fluctuations in dynamic CA efficiency at rest and in response to changes in arterial CO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available