4.5 Article

L-2-Oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylate reverses glutathione oxidation and delays fatigue of skeletal muscle in vitro

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 211-216

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00001.2009

Keywords

diaphragm; respiratory muscle; oxidative stress

Funding

  1. National Space Biomedical Research Institute [MA00209]
  2. American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship [0725334B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferreira LF, Gilliam LA, Reid MB. L-2-Oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylate reverses glutathione oxidation and delays fatigue of skeletal muscle in vitro. J Appl Physiol 107: 211-216, 2009. First published April 30, 2009; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00001.2009.-Fatiguing exercise promotes oxidation of intracellular thiols, notably glutathione. Interventions that oppose or reverse thiol oxidation can inhibit fatigue. The reduced cysteine donor L-2-oxothiazolidine-4-carboxylate (OTC) supports glutathione synthesis and is approved for use in humans but has not been evaluated for effects on skeletal muscle. We tested the hypotheses that OTC would 1) increase reduced glutathione (GSH) levels and decrease oxidized glutathione, and 2) inhibit functional indexes of fatigue. Diaphragm fiber bundles from adult male ICR mice were incubated for 1 or 2 h at 37 degrees C with buffer (control, C) or OTC (10 mM). N-acetylcysteine (NAC; 10 mM) was used as a positive control. We measured GSH metabolites and fatigue characteristics. We found that muscle GSH content was increased after 1-h incubation with OTC or NAC but was not altered after 2-h incubation. One-hour treatment with OTC or NAC slowed the decline in force with repetitive stimulation [mean (SD) fatigue index at 300 s: OTC = 34 +/- 6% vs. C = 50 +/- 8%, P < 0.05; NAC = 55 +/- 4% vs. C = 65 +/- 8%, P < 0.05] as did the 2-h OTC treatment (OTC = 38 +/- 9% vs. C = 51 +/- 9%, P < 0.05). These results demonstrate that OTC modulates the muscle GSH pool and opposes fatigue under the current experimental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available