4.5 Article

CT-measured regional specific volume change reflects regional ventilation in supine sheep

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages 1177-1184

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00212.2007

Keywords

multidetector-row computer tomography scanning; xenon computer tomography; implanted markers; lung mechanics

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-64368] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computer tomography (CT) imaging techniques permit the noninvasive measurement of regional lung function. Regional specific volume change (sVol), determined from the change in lung density over a tidal breath, should correlate with regional ventilation and regional lung expansion measured with other techniques. sVol was validated against xenon (Xe)-CT-specific ventilation (sV.) in four anesthetized, intubated, mechanically ventilated sheep. Xe-CT used expiratory gated axial scanning during the washin and washout of 55% Xe. sVol was measured from the tidal changes in tissue density (H, houndsfield units) of lung regions using the relationship sVol = [1,000(Hi - He)]/[ He(1,000 + Hi)], where He and Hi are expiratory and inspiratory regional density. Distinct anatomical markings were used to define corresponding lung regions of interest between inspiratory, expiratory, and Xe-CT images, with an average region of interest size of 1.6 +/- 0.7 ml. In addition, sVol was compared with regional volume changes measured directly from the positions of implanted metal markers in an additional animal. A linear relationship between sVol and sV. was demonstrated over a wide range of regional sV. found in the normal supine lung, with an overall correlation coefficient (R-2) of 0.66. There was a tight correlation (R-2 = 0.97) between marker-measured volume changes and sVol. Regional sVol, which involves significantly reduced exposure to radiation and Xe gas compared with the Xe-CT method, represents a safe and efficient surrogate for measuring regional ventilation in experimental studies and patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available