4.8 Article

Genetic variance estimation with imputed variants finds negligible missing heritability for human height and body mass index

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 1114-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3390

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1052684, 1078037, 1050218]
  2. Australian Research Council [130102666]
  3. US National Institutes of Health [R01MH100141]
  4. Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation
  5. University of Queensland Foundation
  6. MRC [MC_UU_12015/2, MC_U106179472] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179472, MC_UU_12015/2, MC_PC_15018] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a method (GREML-LDMS) to estimate heritability for human complex traits in unrelated individuals using whole-genome sequencing data. We demonstrate using simulations based on whole-genome sequencing data that similar to 97% and similar to 68% of variation at common and rare variants, respectively, can be captured by imputation. Using the GREML-LDMS method, we estimate from 44,126 unrelated individuals that all similar to 17 million imputed variants explain 56% (standard error (s.e.) = 2.3%) of variance for height and 27% (s.e. = 2.5%) of variance for body mass index (BMI), and we find evidence that height- and BMI-associated variants have been under natural selection. Considering the imperfect tagging of imputation and potential overestimation of heritability from previous family-based studies, heritability is likely to be 60-70% for height and 30-40% for BMI. Therefore, the missing heritability is small for both traits. For further discovery of genes associated with complex traits, a study design with SNP arrays followed by imputation is more cost-effective than whole-genome sequencing at current prices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available