4.8 Article

Contrasting genetic architectures of schizophrenia and other complex diseases using fast variance-components analysis

Journal

NATURE GENETICS
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 1385-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3431

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01 HG006399, R01 MH101244]
  2. US National Institutes of Health fellowship [F32 HG007805]
  3. Fannie and John Hertz Foundation
  4. Netherlands Scientific Organization [NWO 480-05-003]
  5. US National Center for Research Resources [1S10RR028832-01]
  6. MRC [G0800509] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Lundbeck Foundation [R155-2014-1724] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [G0800509, MR/L010305/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heritability analyses of genome-wide association study (GWAS) cohorts have yielded important insights into complex disease architecture, and increasing sample sizes hold the promise of further discoveries. Here we analyze the genetic architectures of schizophrenia in 49,806 samples from the PGC and nine complex diseases in 54,734 samples from the GERA cohort. For schizophrenia, we infer an overwhelmingly polygenic disease architecture in which >= 71% of 1-Mb genomic regions harbor >= 1 variant influencing schizophrenia risk. We also observe significant enrichment of heritability in GC-rich regions and in higher-frequency SNPs for both schizophrenia and GERA diseases. In bivariate analyses, we observe significant genetic correlations (ranging from 0.18 to 0.85) for several pairs of GERA diseases; genetic correlations were on average 1.3 tunes stronger than the correlations of overall disease liabilities. To accomplish these analyses, we developed a fast algorithm for multicomponent, multi-trait variance-components analysis that overcomes prior computational barriers that made such analyses intractable at this scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available