4.6 Article

Photoluminescence lineshape and dynamics of localized excitonic transitions in InAsP epitaxial layers

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 115, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4876121

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF-Career Award [DMR-0846834]
  2. NSF [DMR-1157490]
  3. State of Florida
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. UCGP
  6. Institute of Critical Technology and Applied Sciences (ICTAS) at Virginia Tech.
  7. Division Of Materials Research
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0846834] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The excitonic radiative transitions of InAsxP1-x (x = 0.13 and x = 0.40) alloy epitaxial layers were studied through magnetic field and temperature dependent photoluminescence and time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy. While the linewidth and lineshape of the exciton transition for x = 0.40 indicate the presence of alloy broadening due to random anion distribution and the existence of localized exciton states, those of x = 0.13 suggest that this type of compositional disorder is absent in x = 0.13. This localization is further supported by the behavior of the exciton transitions at low temperature and high magnetic fields. InAs0.4P0.6 exhibits anomalous S-shaped temperature dependence of the excition emission peak below 100K as well as linewidth broadening at high magnetic fields due to the compression of the excitonic volume amid compositional fluctuations. Finally, photoluminescence decay patterns suggest that the excitons radiatively relax through two channels, a fast and a slow decay. While the lifetime of the fast decay is comparable for both compositions (similar to 30 ps), that of the slow decay increases from 206 ps to 427 ps as x increases from 0.13 to 0.40, attributable to carrier migration between the localization states of InAs0.4P0.6. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available