4.6 Article

Surface recombination in doped semiconductors: Effect of light excitation power and of surface passivation

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 114, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4821139

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French embassy in Moscow
  2. CONICYT Grant Becas Chile

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For n- and p-type semiconductors doped above the 10(16) cm(-3) range, simple analytical expressions for the surface recombination velocity S have been obtained as a function of excitation power P and surface state density N-T. These predictions are in excellent agreement with measurements on p-type GaAs films, using a novel polarized microluminescence technique. The effect on S of surface passivation is a combination of the changes of three factors, each of which depends on N-T: (i) a power-independent factor which is inversely proportional to N-T and (ii) two factors which reveal the effect of photovoltage and the shift of the electron surface quasi Fermi level, respectively. In the whole range of accessible excitation powers, these two factors play a significant role so that S always depends on power. Three physical regimes are outlined. In the first regime, illustrated experimentally by the oxidized GaAs surface, S depends on P as a power law of exponent determined by N-T. A decrease of S such as the one induced by sulfide passivation is caused by a marginal decrease of N-T. In a second regime, as illustrated by GaInP-encapsulated GaAs, because of the reduced value of S, the photoelectron concentration in the subsurface depletion layer can no longer be neglected. Thus, S-1 depends logarithmically on P and very weakly on surface state density. In a third regime, expected at extremely small values of P, the photovoltage is comparable to the thermal energy, and S increases with P and decreases with increasing N-T. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available