4.8 Article

mTOR regulates MAPKAPK2 translation to control the senescence-associated secretory phenotype

Journal

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 1205-+

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3225

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [U01-AG022303]
  2. MRC
  3. EMBO fellowship
  4. BBSRC [BB/H020527/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MC_U120085810, MR/M000125/1, MC_U120097114] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H020527/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Cancer Research UK [13315, 16243] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [W1055] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/M000125/1, MC_U120085810, 1375544, 1229061, MC_U120097114] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Senescent cells secrete a combination of factors collectively known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). The SASP reinforces senescence and activates an immune surveillance response, but it can also show pro-tumorigenic properties and contribute to age-related pathologies. In a drug screen to find new SASP regulators, we uncovered the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin as a potent SASP suppressor. Here we report a mechanism by which mTOR controls the SASP by differentially regulating the translation of the MK2 (also known as MAPKAPK2) kinase through 4EBP1. In turn, MAPKAPK2 phosphorylates the RNA-binding protein ZFP36L1 during senescence, inhibiting its ability to degrade the transcripts of numerous SASP components. Consequently, mTOR inhibition or constitutive activation of ZFP36L1 impairs the non-cell-autonomous effects of senescent cells in both tumour-suppressive and tumour-promoting contexts. Altogether, our results place regulation of the SASP as a key mechanism by which mTOR could influence cancer, age-related diseases and immune responses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available