4.6 Article

Comparison of post-detonation combustion in explosives incorporating aluminum nanoparticles: Influence of the passivation layer

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4790159

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Air Force Research Laboratory under NanoEnergetics Program
  2. Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) [HDTRA-07-1-0026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aluminum nanoparticles and explosive formulations that incorporate them have been a subject of ongoing interest due to the potential of aluminum particles to dramatically increase energy content relative to conventional organic explosives. We have used time-resolved atomic and molecular emission spectroscopy to monitor the combustion of aluminum nanoparticles within the overall chemical dynamics of post-detonation fireballs. We have studied the energy release dynamics of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) charges incorporating three types of aluminum nanoparticles: commercial oxide-passivated nanoparticles, oleic acid-capped aluminum nanoparticles (AlOA), and nanoparticles in which the oxide shell of the particle has been functionalized with an acrylic monomer and copolymerized into a fluorinated acrylic matrix (AlFA). The results indicate that the commercial nanoparticles and the AlFA nanoparticles are oxidized at a similar rate, while the AlOA nanoparticles combust more quickly. This is most likely due to the fact that the commercial nano-Al and the AlFA particles are both oxide-passivated, while the AlOA particles are protected by an organic shell that is more easily compromised than an oxide layer. The peak fireball temperatures for RDX charges containing 20 wt. % of commercial nano-Al, AlFA, or AlOA were similar to 3900 K, similar to 3400 K, and similar to 4500 K, respectively. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4790159]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available