4.6 Article

Disorder effects on electronic bandgap and transport in graphene-nanomesh-based structures

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4772609

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French ANR under the project NANOSIM-GRAPHENE [ANR-09-NANO-016]
  2. French ANR under the project MIGRAQUEL [ANR-10-BLAN-0304]
  3. Vietnam's National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED)
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-BLAN-0304] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using atomistic quantum simulation based on a tight binding model, we investigate the formation of electronic bandgap E-g of graphene nanomesh (GNM) lattices and the transport characteristics of GNM-based electronic devices (single potential barrier structure and p-n junction) including the atomic edge disorder of holes. We find that the sensitivity of E-g to the lattice symmetry (i.e., the lattice orientation and the hole shape) is significantly suppressed in the presence of disorder. In the case of strong disorder, the dependence of E-g on the neck width fits well with the scaling rule observed in experiments [Liang et al., Nano Lett. 10, 2454 (2010)]. Considering the transport characteristics of GNM-based structures, we demonstrate that the use of finite GNM sections in the devices can efficiently improve their electrical performance (i.e., high ON/OFF current ratio, good current saturation, and negative differential conductance behaviors). Additionally, if the length of GNM sections is suitably chosen, the detrimental effects of disorder on transport can be avoided to a large extent. Our study provides a good explanation of the available experimental data on GNM energy gap and should be helpful for further investigations of GNM-based devices. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4772609]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available