4.6 Article

An improved model for non-resonant terahertz detection in field-effect transistors

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3676211

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Humboldt Foundation
  2. NSF MRSEC [DMR-0520415 (MRL-UCSB)]
  3. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, via STTR [FA9550-10-C-0177]
  4. UCSB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transistors operating well above the frequencies at which they have gain can still rectify terahertz currents and voltages, and have attracted interest as room-temperature terahertz detectors. We show that such rectifying field-effect transistors may still be treated as a lumped element device in the limit where plasma resonances of the electron gas do not occur. We derive analytic formulas for important transistor parameters, such as effective rectification length and device impedance using a transmission-line model. We draw conclusions for plasma-resonant detection where possible. We derive the THz response of a field-effect transistor with a two-dimensional electron-gas channel by a Taylor expansion of the drain-source bias. We connect circuit theory to the existing theories that describe the bias in the gated region by differential equations. Parasitic effects, such as the access resistance, are included. With the approach presented in this paper, we derive the responsivity for a novel field detector that mixes a (THz) signal applied between gate and source with another signal applied between drain and source in homodyne or heterodyne operation mode. We further derive expressions for the expected noise-equivalent power (NEP) in direct detection and mixing mode, including parasitic effects, and find that sub-pW/root Hz achievable for realistic device and material parameters for direct detection and less than 900K noise temperature for mixing at 10 mu W local oscillator power. (C) 2012 American Institute of Physics. [doi: 10.1063/1.3676211]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available